🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," said one MEP driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that states globally are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to self-regulate.